In Tuesday night’s essential debate, Romney’s awkward phrase will dictate how thousands of Americans see the presidential election. Instead of focusing on the interviewers’ questions, which portrayed worries about memories of the past, we choose “binders filled with women” to be the cynosure of the national discussion. Seconds after the statement was made, numerous angry and satirical tweets at #womeninbinders appeared all over the internet. Many stopped watching the debate all together to follow the bound conversation. Should this bizarre diction really be what’s extrapolated from the debate? With worries of a global recession, this election could be one of the most important ever. History is continuously shaping the worries of tomorrow, should Romney’s uncomfortable diction really persuade and propagate the memories from the debate?
No comments:
Post a Comment